Why Lincoln Warned Us Not To Surrender to Corporations. So did Hamilton

Why Lincoln Warned Us Not To Surrender Our Political Power - The Winning Words Project

Lincoln, and the so called libertarian, Alexander Hamilton, wanted regulation of corporations. We have fought for corporations' rights over our own, because the corporation controlled media managed to divide middle class and poor. And they won while the middle class and poor lost.

Comments

  1. rob richardsApril 10, 2013 at 1:51 AM

    Thanks for the article. I think you need to understand what Libertarianism is about.

    For info on people using voluntary Libertarian tools on similar and other issues worldwide, please see the non-partisan Libertarian International Organization @ http://www.Libertarian-International.org ....

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Gary AndersonApril 10, 2013 at 7:30 AM

      Rob, the problem with libertarianism is that it spawned Thatcherism and deregulation of the banks. The housing bubble would not have happened without this Thatcher libertarianism as I pointed out here:

      http://www.recourse-loans.com/2013/04/margaret-thatcher-died-today-and-i-am.html

      Libertarians say they are against corporatism, yet they let the banks have free reign. And yet the bankers need to be regulated so they won't give out hurtful loans that are doomed to failure.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Learn Economics

Image
Learn economics. Topics in Economics can give even the newbie insights into how the economies of the world work with a focus on China and the USA. There are 30 topics listed with articles on those subjects, as well as a glossary of terms.
I have written a lot of vetted articles that are exclusive** to Talkmarkets. Sorting a portion of them by subject will give the reader an opportunity to make sense of it all. I am adding a glossary of terms at the bottom of this page.

For readers interested in economic subjects of the day, these top 30 themes are my efforts to make understanding economics easier:

I have pinned the following article to the top because it is an insight into my personal life, as well as a commentary on isms. Capitalism is still the greatest system for creating wealth. However, it is often mixed, and mixturism is a factor in its success or failure:




1. China! 

Dangerous History Repeats

Trump May Be Wrong About Winning a Trade War

Keynes and Trump Tariffs
The Achilles Heel of Tru…
Read more

The Poison of Trump Comes From Murray Rothbard, Fascist Divider

There is further study in the articles I have cited for you at the end of this article. People must, must understand that Donald Trump is a divider of races and ethnicity, because at heart he is a fascist. Fascism seeks the purity of the races. Fascism is the opposite of what America stands for.  Keep in mind that Donald Trump is highly influenced by Anarcho Capitalist, Murray Rothbard. This is an email I sent to an author online. It is slightly muddled, but overall quite accurate in its assessment of Libertarian Murray Rothbard:

Hi Steve,
I agree with your article on Rothbard, mostly. However, as a British court ruled, Zionism is not the essence of what it means to be Jewish. Therefore, I hate antiSemitism, and embrace antiZionism. I have both religious and non religious reasons for taking this stand. And the court absolves me of racism. After all my natural father was Jewish. And more and more Jews hate Zionism. And Zionism is quite multiracial at this point.
So, Trump actually is …
Read more

John Mauldin Discusses What Could Go Wrong

This article was first published by me on Talkmarkets: http://www.talkmarkets.com/content/bonds/john-mauldin-discusses-what-could-go-wrong?post=118623&uid=4798

John Mauldin published an article regarding the economics of Donald Trump. I share many of his views. I think the article deserves to be discussed further.

It isn't as if John Mauldin is happy with the continual drive toward negative yields and the new normal. I believe he is like many, willing to fight for higher interest rates within reason and within the economic boundaries that exist. He is on board with the Fed, unlike other central banks, and is willing to risk recession to avoid negative rates:

Meanwhile, the Fed is in the middle of a long-overdue policy turn. There’s still a risk that they will find they started tightening just in time for a recession, which is also long overdue. I was convinced last summer that they would push rates negative in that scenario. Negative rates could yet happen, but I think they wi…
Read more