Tuesday, March 31, 2015

Jamie Dimon Doesn't Fear Being a Criminal When Called Out by Warren


Major points in this article show the shocking behavior and attitude of Jamie Dimon and by inference, big bankers in general:

1. Elizabeth Warren calls out Jamie Dimon for taking on too much risk and for breaking the law.

2. Jamie Dimon responds by saying his bank could afford the fines.

3. Now the banks threaten to withhold campaign donations to Democrats if they don't stop Warren from attempting to regulate the banks further.

4. This inference based on the article: The banks  incur no criminal penalties, as they do not acknowledge any criminal acts while paying the fines. Dimon has no fear of being prosecuted as a criminal for breaking the law.

This, of course, is the New World Order at work, and what FDR, Eisenhower, and JFK fought against, government being railroaded by the international globalist banking cartel.

Saturday, March 28, 2015

The History of Globalization Cannot Be Placed with University Historians


Many like those writing the above article, seek to have historians from universities document globalization. There is a serious problem with this approach. Many of the political and religious and economic factors that influence globalization are backed by real conspiracies.

I don't see colleges even bothering to explore these conspiracies. They want to keep main stream. They want to establish their credibility and they would either have to debunk conspiracies, which is a process of lying about 9/11, Sandy Hook, the motive for the Iraq War, the plan for regime change in the middle east, etc., or they would have to ignore the conspiracies. Serious students would tear them apart, intellectually.

So I can understand why historians don't want to touch globalization with a 10 foot pole. Even Noam Chomsky, who approaches the issue of globalization from an historical perspective, has a blind spot when it comes to conspiracy. There are virtually no conspiracies that he will accept. He denies them all, even those with a boatload of circumstantial evidence.

I wrote a satire piece, accusing Prof. Chomsky of having the Ebulla Virus, a make believe virus that keeps people from seeing conspiracy and from seeing the forest for the trees. Here is a sample:

There is no cure for the Ebulla Virus except in extraordinary instances. Some have tried to box one around the ears, trying to jar the barnacle like substance off the outside crust of brain tissue. That has only worked twice, with Mike Tyson and this author. But, Chomsky won't let anyone get close enough to box his ears. MIT security is just too strong to attempt an intervention.

Other famous individuals have had the Ebulla Virus and it still clings to their brains. One notable infected one is Whoopi Goldberg, who can't be convinced by Rosie O'donnell or even when threatened with a body slam by Jesse Ventura, to believe in the obvious 9/11 conspiracy. It is a shame, really.

Chomsky is the smartest man to ever have had the disease. Not only does the virus affect the ability to spot conspiracy, but it also inflicts what is known as Can't-See-the-Forest-For-the-Trees syndrome.


Monday, March 23, 2015

Were collateralized debt obligations (CDO) responsible for the 2008 financial crisis?


Turns out, the Bankruptcy Bill of 2007, which destroyed the ability for a clean break from one's past debts, forced people out of their homes, exactly what the bankers wanted. They got their property back.

Not covered in this article is that the Republicans pushed this bill and are the evil culprits, but a small group of Democrats, led by Harry Reid, enabled the bill to be passed.

This article points out that the wicked Bankruptcy Bill of 2007 has caused a special scorn to be placed upon these Democrats who abandoned their constituency for the rich and powerful.

Harry Reid deserves scorn for passing this Wicked Zionist bill. He has done much for the New World Order and if he lost sight in both eyes (he injured himself and lost sight in one eye), it would not repay the damage he has done to the American middle class and poor.

No one hopes Harry Reid goes blind or that politicians suffer horrific injury for their evil deeds, but it would be a just and fair result for his betrayal of Mainstreet USA. Perhaps God has shown his wrath on Harry Reid, with the severe accident he encountered.

The passage of the Bankruptcy Bill forced homeowners out and destroyed the CDO's. Harry was likely not even aware that this result was exactly what the central banks wanted as they clearly profit off of crisis. 

Sunday, March 22, 2015

I Can Prove the Fed Is Screwing the USA. The Award of the Millenium Goes to the Federal Reserve!

The Fed is screwing the USA. The Fed deserves an award for this achievement. In only one year the screwing has taken place, but the Fed is over 100 years old! The profits of the Fed have given it the special Screw America in Perpetuity Award. This is the award of the millenium because the screwing is continual.

So, how does the Fed screw America exactly? Well, it has been reported that the Fed's yearly operating costs are around 5.7 billion dollars per year. But its profits  have increased insanely because of the financial crisis. It was reported by Bernanke that the Fed sent 350 billion to the US treasury since 2009 through 2013. That was more than the previous 18 years. The Fed profits off of crisis.

You say, well, yes, but the profits go to the treasury. Only problem with this is that an insane amount of the profits do not go to the treasury.

Victoria McGrane wrote a piece in the Wall Street Journal on January 10, 2014, where she basically said that the Fed keeps out operating expenses but sends much of the remainder of the money to the Treasury. Notice the word "much".

So, 90 billion in profits, 5.7 billion in expenses and 77 billion in money sent to the Treasury. Who keeps the leftover billions? According to Forbes in an article published 1/9/2015, written by Samantha Sharf, part of the Fed's expenditures include payment of dividends! What? Who gets the dividends?

Why would there be dividends if this scamming bank is totally public? Well, it isn't. The Fed is a private bank, and Lewis Versus the USA, 1982, proved Fed employees are privately employed.

So, the dividends paid are taxpayer moneys going to the private banks who support the Fed. There should be no dividends, of billions of dollars per year, out of this money. This is American taxpayer money.

Hence, we presented the Screw America in Perpetuity Award to Janet Yellen in a solemn ceremony at my house. She is a short little woman.

I would hope you gain comfort in knowing that the dividends go to the banks in each Fed district, plus additional shareholders, who are private citizens and are likely foreign citizens. Some are Rothschilds. There, does that make you American sleepyheads feel better? I hope it makes you sick.

Some have said that these foreign investors do not exist. They are sometimes the same people who say the dividends paid are less than 1 percent. I have just shown that to be false. While the ownership of the Fed is certainly veiled, we know that there is more here than meets the eye. This is why the Fed does not want an audit of their dividends and where they go. 

If the Rothschilds get a piece of every central bank out there that could add up to some real money.

And yet the Rothschilds are left off of the billionaires list every year. That is because, as many have said, they are trillionaires, and certainly have every means to hide their money. If a small player like Mitt Romney can hide his money offshore, think of what the Rothschilds do.

And you can always write a law making it "legal".

And it isn't just the money. Foreign, especially UK operatives, are appointing people like Timothy Geithner and others to manipulate the monetary policy of the United States and control regulation of the banks. No doubt tiny Janet gets her marching orders from those people.

We know liar loans and adjustable loans, written into US law by the Garn-St. Germain Depository Institutions Act, of 1982, were first attempted, on a large scale, in the UK, where they were called Self Certified Loans. I wrote an article on Business Insider about those. It is unfortunate that this act was not labeled, the Liar Loan Act, or the Easy Money Adjustable Loan Act. But that would reveal too much to blind America.

Well, clearly, the UK was the proving ground for those loans and the Thatcherism that brought that deregulation ended up bringing deregulation here.

After all, we already had the US law signed by Ronnie Raygun. He had no clue. That deregulation caused the Savings and Loan Debacle and then the Housing Crisis and Credit Crisis of the Great Recession. Ronnie didn't live to see that manifestation of his handiwork. This worldwide speculation on housing was established by the financial elite.   

You know who they are, the globalist AngloZionists. It has been said that the entire British royalty is bound up with the UK banksters. If one falls the other falls. Virtually all the royals are Zionists.

Why else would the Queen of England have to submit herself to the Lord Mayor of the Crown that counts, the Square Mile Crown, the real power in world finance. The City of London, Londinium, or the City, is not ruled by Parliament. It is a separate and sovereign power protected by the Queen. It fancies itself the new Roman Empire.

Interesting that this Crown Corporation has 12 banks, including the Bank of Rothschild, that rule. The Fed has 12 private banks too. Modeled after the Crown we are.

Timothy Geithner was given a small replica of the Screw America in Perpetuity Award as he was instrumental, as president of the NY Fed, the most powerful Federal Reserve Bank, for allowing liar loans bound up into bogus CDO's and their accompanying CDS derivatives, to be spread all over the world by the other major derivatives criminal, Henry Paulson. Mortgage backed securities were from Hell. And the banking devil was Tim Geithner.

Turns out his term ran parallel to the bogus AAA rated bonds and bad loans, given to anyone with a pulse, were spread far and wide and even to our own local governments, who are still struggling with derivatives.

And that doesn't even account for the criminal act of spreading interest rate derivatives, an even bigger market than the mortgage backed securities. Those derivatives were for governments to hedge potential inflation. Of course, the Fed tipped the banks, who all knew that inflation would be under control for years, and the banks took the other side of the bet. Governments lost big time, with no relief as this piece is being written. Don't hold your breath for justice on that one. 

And yet no RICO prosecutions for securities fraud, especially for passing out bogus Mortgage Backed Securities?

Those two banksters, Geithner from the Fed and Paulson from Goldman Sachs, were rewarded in this screwing of America with jobs as Secretaries of the Treasury. Fook both of them, in perpetuity.

And Fook the Fed in perpetuity as well. Criminals with a license is all they are. 

Disclaimer: This article contains satire and humor, and while loaded with truth in my opinion, it is up to the reader to verify the claims of the article, which are made in jest and are not necessarily proven fact. Some claims are fiction. 

Thursday, March 19, 2015

Formaldehyde Was Dangerous in Furniture. Now We Have Lumber Liquidators and Class Action Lawsuit

When I was contributing to Business Insider, I wrote an article about how your furniture could be making you sick thanks to globalization. Imported furniture from some nations had a large coating of formaldehyde on them. The article was pretty much ignored, even by Business Insider editors.

Well, now, there is a class action lawsuit filed in Las Vegas alleging that flooring from Lumber Liquidators could be making you sick as well. It does not surprise me, as much of the flooring is imported as well.

My daughter and her son-in-law have a hobby of walking through expensive new homes, and my daughter is very sensitive to formaldehyde. It flat makes her sick. Turns out, she has seen studs used to frame houses and commented that they are being coated in formaldehyde as well. That could be a big problem when it comes to living in a finished house.

But flooring is really toxic, and I had commented to her that many houses literally make your eyes burn when you walk into them. That burning stays with you if you buy that house. I complained to my daughter that it was the flooring, and she had not thought that flooring could give off such toxicity.

Well, in the light of these new lawsuits, it appears very likely that flooring is making people sick. One fellow said he got pnuemonia from installing toxic flooring.

While all that will work itself out in the courts, be very careful what you buy. Check the framing in the new construction around your chosen house. Check the flooring, especially laminate flooring. Watch out for the furniture, especially with dark finishes and red cherry finishes. If it doesn't pass the sniff test, don't buy it.

We live in a world where clearly unacceptable levels of formaldehyde is making it to American shores. 60 Minutes ran a story showing formaldehyde levels exceeding 20 times what is allowed, is making it to US shores.

The lawsuit in Las Vegas requires Lumber Liquidators to test and verify rather than to be trusted. The lawsuit alleges that Lumber Liquidators can no longer be trusted. As I said, this all will be worked out in court, but my opinion has been clear long before the 60 Minutes story.My article, with quote below, was written almost 3 years ago.

Here is a quote from my article on Business Insider. Notice that this criticism of furniture can also be applied to almost any building materials now:

So, what happens if this is the only furniture you can afford? Well, there are safe coat applications that are formaldehyde free, and they can be applied to seal the toxins in. You can google the location of these products.

Globalization killed our pets, and I won't buy any dog food that is made in China. I buy other things made in China, but not dog food. The same thing is happening to children, with an assault by furniture that could cause ear infections and worse.

Like I say, there is not a lot of documented evidence, just my own family's experience being sensitive to formaldehyde. For many people, this is likely not a big issue, but for others it is a health issue that is critical.

Furniture is a latecomer to imports. So maybe these issues can get resolved soon. But if not, buyers need to take caution. Failure to do so could result in all kinds of illnesses that could be misdiagnosed as chronic fatigue, etc.

And China is not the only culprit when it comes to excessive formaldehyde. Other nations in Asia are exceeding standards as well, as my article pointed out. I urge you to read the entire article.
Globalization has serious perils. Someone in the USA responsible for quality keeps dropping the ball. Boycott these toxic products for the sake of your health and be wary of our system for stopping bad products from reaching our shores. 

If you have furniture, safe coat can help. But that won't help you with your framed walls and I am not sure if it will help with floors.

Sunday, March 15, 2015

Remembering the Housing Bubble. Demand From First Time Buyers Is at All Time Low

Demand from first time buyers at all time low. Logan has reasons here for the record low demand. There is still a mortgage depression in this nation: 

1. Delay in marriage (Dual incomes missing)
2. A lack of a strong paying full-time job with security.
3. Older Americans are unable to retire due to lack of savings – they replace younger workers, who have trouble finding jobs.
4. Having enough for a down payment plus closing cost with taxes impounded is a lot for young aspiring home buyers.
5. Renting isn’t considered a bad option anymore from young Americans.
6. Exotic loans that allow would be homeowners to obtain credit without collateral or income verification are removed from the market.
7. Financially strapped parents are unable to “gift” down payments for first home purchases by their children.
8. Student loan debt impacted household formation from rising and making it more expensive for first time home buyers to buy.
9. Despite the weak first time buyer market, home prices go up in many markets due to the lack of inventory, keeping home ownership even further out of reach.


Sunday, March 8, 2015

Mark Cuban Wants to Undermine the US Educational System by Capping Student Loan Amounts

Mark Cuban wants to undermine the US educational system by capping student loans. He may think that will force colleges to lower their tuition and fees, but it will likely have the effect of forcing many students to get an education that is less helpful toward future earnings. That is my opinion at least.

I don't trust Mark Cuban. But if he knows that the globalist lenders will pull the plug on student loans, he needs to come out and say it instead of beating around the bush. After all, he is a Business Insider isn't he?

Here is the article written at Business Insider and you decide if the guy knows something that would crush the educational system. He obviously wants it to crash based on my interpretation of the article.

What patriotic American would want the US to have a less educated workforce? It is over my head to figure this guy out. If you don't want to see American children educated, just come out and say it Mark.

We know colleges are taking advantage of the system. The answer is to put price controls on the colleges, not to stop allowing kids an education because they cannot get a loan.

Capping the loan amount for students will leave them out in the cold regarding their effort to obtain an education.

Notice the comment section, where a fellow said interest rates should be capped, allowing students the ability to afford loan payback. The banksters shills who dominated the voting and commenting now at Business Insider all voted that down massively. I don't understand why that website apparently allows these folks who want a weaker America to control the comments.

All the anti bankster guys have pretty much stopped commenting on Business Insider as far as I can tell. There are still a few, but some of them are kooky libertarians. There are not as many as when I was submitting articles to the site.

If the private sector cannot handle education, perhaps the government should take the program of education over and cap costs. Cuban is admitting that capitalism is a big fail here, and I agree with that.

But don't punish the student like America punished the homeowner.

Capitalism fails and the capitalists get reimbursed while the borrower gets the shaft. That is sick.